Comfort doesn’t use logic. He thinks he does, but it’s so superficial that there are several equally logical counter-arguments to every one of his arguments.

1. No, it mustn’t. No, it doesn’t. Are you completely blind? We have nerves that go from our brains, down around our genitals and up towards our chests again. That isn’t “by design”. If it is, then the designer was either stupid or drunk. We see the world upside down. Instead of making an eye that sees the world correctly, our brains have to trick us into thinking down is down, when really it’s up. “No more evidence needed” my ass. This is such a weak argument it’s pitiable.

2. So who created God? “He always existed”? Then why can’t time? Who are you to know these things for certain? How do you, a mere mortal, make absolute statements about God and the beginning of time? Again, if you think this makes a convincing argument, I pity you. I really do.

3. “Only the Judeo-Christian God”? What? But I can also claim to be those things. That means I’m God! I’m just following your own logic here. You just proved that I’m God. Do you still not see the flaws in these arguments?

4. “He” doesn’t tell us squat. Man wrote the Bible. Man made up the myths that later became religion. You’re saying that because a book claims that God exists, he does?

Conclusion: I didn’t think I could find a person with more shallow and less thought-through arguments than Ray Comfort, yet here you are. I’m speechless. Just stumped, that any person capable of taking care of him or herself could be so daft as to think these are convincing, persuasive arguments.

It’s quite obvious to me that you haven’t spent any time whatsoever actually critically thinking about your beliefs. You’ve swallowed everything whole, and you didn’t even bother to chew. The fact that you haven’t choked yet is what I find most spectacular.

1. Anything complex must have a creator or it would function like crap. Since creation functions in all its complexity like a well maintained machine it must have had a creator. No more evidence needed.

2. Since time has a beginning then something out side of time must have created it. Just the fact we have time shows that there was a beginning. God is outside of time. We know a God therefore exists.

3. We have a moral law within us because of this law that is not dependent on human factors like society, local authority, community and/or nurture from parents. Then we know there was a law creator and since it is part of our being then we know someone, one with a perfect moral being who has the skill to create humans exists. Only the Judeo Christian God claims to have these qualities therefore he must exist.

4. If you come to the conclusion that Jesus Christ is God and he created us then you will take his word for what evidence will be convincing to humans because that is how he designed us. He says that we cannot convince people on an intellectual basis we can only convince on a conscience level. So he tells us to focus on appealing to people’s moral guilt for how they run their lives and that will be convincing enough.

Conclusion: That is what Comfort attempts to do over and over again, the end. He is not a being an ass or ridiculous, he is just following instructions. He is either wrong or he is right we will ultimately find out in the end but he is trying to make the case not to wait till then.

There’s nothing wrong with my “comprehension”, but your grammar and spelling leaves much to be desired.

I’m quite satisfied with my way of life, thank you, it’s the way of life Christians choose that conflict with my way of life that I’m dissatisfied with. Again, no hate involved. I leave such extreme emotions to you.

Simply put, Ray makes no sense at all. Not even the arguments based on the Bible make any sense. Again, why is homosexuality such a horrible sin, but pedophilia doesn’t even get a single mention? It’s all a thin veil to unsuccessfully hide his own bigotry and homophobia.

God punishes thought crime. Coveting is a thought based process and yet it is included in the 10 Commandments. Same with lust. It is not only the actions that condemn, but the thought.

There is a strong precedent for Christians to feel they can punish thought.

Second, I’m not “hating” anything. Ok, maybe I do hate organized religion for all the hurt and evil they represent, both in modern times and throughout history. It is due to religion, and religious beliefs alone, that people are being burned and tortured as “witches” in Africa right now. That’s just ONE example of the horrors for which I hate religion. Oh, and guess what: those people in Africa are Christians. Wouldn’t you know…

Your turn, my “friend”.

Interesting statement. Will YOU tolerate Ray’s beliefs? I thought not (as evidence of your entire blog dedicated to him). Nice try though. You could believe or not believe and go on your way but you find it necessary to unknowingly PROVE the very bible and ideas you hate by hating them and making it your point to be actively against them. Interesting indeed my friend.

Also, atheist =/= evolutionist. The two have nothing whatsoever to do with eachother, and to conflate them is to draw a cheap straw man to attack; a cowardly practice.