Comments on: Hovind Explained http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/2009/08/hovind-explained/ On the matters of faiths, beliefs, sciences and worldviews. Wed, 09 May 2012 10:25:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Reggie http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/2009/08/hovind-explained/#comment-247 Reggie Sun, 03 Jul 2011 20:11:01 +0000 http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/?p=212#comment-247 Yo, that's what's up turthlfuly. Yo, that’s what’s up turthlfuly.

]]> By: Nathaniel http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/2009/08/hovind-explained/#comment-116 Nathaniel Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:14:44 +0000 http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/?p=212#comment-116 It is not clear at all, unless you explain why. Ironically, this kind of argument is actually dealt with in this very video. You cannot simply state something as fact, and then pat yourself on the back. You have to explain why it is how you claim it is, and then provide evidence to support that position. Please do come back and tell me when you can explain why ExtantDodo's video is "invalid". It is not clear at all, unless you explain why. Ironically, this kind of argument is actually dealt with in this very video. You cannot simply state something as fact, and then pat yourself on the back. You have to explain why it is how you claim it is, and then provide evidence to support that position.

Please do come back and tell me when you can explain why ExtantDodo’s video is “invalid”.

]]> By: Art Ellingsen http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/2009/08/hovind-explained/#comment-114 Art Ellingsen Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:24:37 +0000 http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/?p=212#comment-114 I'm sorry, I misspelled the word "attack". I’m sorry, I misspelled the word “attack”.

]]> By: Art Ellingsen http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/2009/08/hovind-explained/#comment-113 Art Ellingsen Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:15:48 +0000 http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/?p=212#comment-113 It is clear that this attach on Kent Hovind is totally invalid. It is clear that this attach on Kent Hovind is totally invalid.

]]>