Hovind Explained
Youtuber ExtantDodo has a series of videos where he dissects each of Kent Hovind’s arguments for Creationism. The last video was uploaded in November 2008, but since Hovind himself is in jail for tax fraud anyway, I guess there’s no real rush in making more videos…
Anyway, I’d like to present the first video in this series of four, along with three bonus videos. This one deals specifically with Hovind’s own wacky definition of the term evolution, something that doesn’t really mean the same for him as for the entire scientific community. Watch for yourselves, and you’ll see what I mean:
[youtube]fCGz9dMd1Y8[/youtube]
As I said, this is just the first in a series. The rest of the videos can be seen right here.
It is clear that this attach on Kent Hovind is totally invalid.
I’m sorry, I misspelled the word “attack”.
It is not clear at all, unless you explain why. Ironically, this kind of argument is actually dealt with in this very video. You cannot simply state something as fact, and then pat yourself on the back. You have to explain why it is how you claim it is, and then provide evidence to support that position.
Please do come back and tell me when you can explain why ExtantDodo’s video is “invalid”.