Ray Comfort Proves God Was Not Alone

One thing I’ve always wondered is why Christians will often argue that mere human wisdom will get us nowhere, that science can’t discover God because he dwells outside the natural realm. Yet these Christians claim to know all sorts of things about God for sure, simply by instinct. How is it that God is natural enough to directly manipulate his followers’ brains into knowing intimate details concerning his methods, goals and wishes, yet he is at the same time completely and utterly undetectable by any kind of human means, even though we should at least be able to measure the changing brain waves of someone being affected by God. It simply makes no sense, unless the point really is to convey the illusion of knowledge about the ultimately unknowable.

For example, Christians like Ray Comfort will argue that complex design is proof that there is an intelligent designer, because they cannot imagine any way for these designs to form naturally. One of Ray’s favorite lines is that atheists believe “nothing created everything” (which, according to him, is “intellectually embarrassing”), and that by taking God out of the equation we’re left dealing with the fact that the chicken spontaneously chose to lay an egg one day, without anyone or anything “designing” that egg in the first place. It is of course the most horrible of straw men, neither atheists nor scientists believe any such thing. However, they will also refuse to take their own logic and reasoning that one small step further. If the argument is that nothing complex could arise without intelligent design, then the intelligent design that creates these complexities will also, in turn, be complex enough to warrant a creator of its own. This leads to an infinite regress, and neither solves any problems nor answers any questions.

In essence, when Ray tells me that I believe “nothing created everything”, he is also telling me that he believes that “nothing created God, which then created everything” whether he likes it or not. Yet pointing this out will render nothing but silence, or a change of subject, as response. He must, for his own faith’s sake, ignore any further reasoning along those very lines, lest he end up realizing that God is impossible.

If you want to watch real intellectual embarrassment in action, look no further than to Ray Comfort, the very master of digging one’s own grave.

    • Kerri Love
    • July 13th, 2009

    Yes I always enjoy the idea that matter can’t “invent” itself but hey, The existance of an omnipotent being is more then just reasonable, to believe otherwise is downright foolish… o.O I just don’t get it. How can such a being seem more plausable then… well… anything really?

  1. Kerri, I’m not really sure I’m understanding your comment correctly. Are you saying it’s foolish to believe anything other than that an omnipotent being exists, or are you saying that anything seems more plausible than such a being’s existence? The two concepts seem to contradict each other quite strongly :)

  1. No trackbacks yet.