<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good News, Everyone!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/2009/03/good-news-everyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/2009/03/good-news-everyone/</link>
	<description>On the matters of faiths, beliefs, sciences and worldviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/2009/03/good-news-everyone/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/?p=83#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Subtle nuance is hard to convey in text :)

I mean to say that evolution is fact and scientific theory, while creationism/ID is precisely what creationists/IDists claim that evolution is: &quot;just a theory&quot;. They use theory as in conjecture or guess, a definition that fits perfectly with their own worldview, but not actually with evolutionary theory.

So you&#039;re absolutely right, and I never meant for anyone to think that I was saying that creationism is anything other than hypothesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subtle nuance is hard to convey in text :)</p>
<p>I mean to say that evolution is fact and scientific theory, while creationism/ID is precisely what creationists/IDists claim that evolution is: &#8220;just a theory&#8221;. They use theory as in conjecture or guess, a definition that fits perfectly with their own worldview, but not actually with evolutionary theory.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re absolutely right, and I never meant for anyone to think that I was saying that creationism is anything other than hypothesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slater</title>
		<link>http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/2009/03/good-news-everyone/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulltheplugonignorance.com/?p=83#comment-7</guid>
		<description>No, creationism and intelligent design are NOT theories, they are at best hypotheses. For something to be a theory, it must be well-substantiated with evidence.

Evolution IS a theory, the problem is that theists often don&#039;t know the difference between theories and hypotheses, so please don&#039;t give them more ammo by mistaking them as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, creationism and intelligent design are NOT theories, they are at best hypotheses. For something to be a theory, it must be well-substantiated with evidence.</p>
<p>Evolution IS a theory, the problem is that theists often don&#8217;t know the difference between theories and hypotheses, so please don&#8217;t give them more ammo by mistaking them as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

